🚨 Watch Free Strategies To Win Consistently & Grow Your Bankroll Here 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsZmejg215k&list=PLtJ7nFyeMChv6NNRjPpHelah8SAlUhmff
_________________________________________________
At Linemaker Sports, it’s our mission to make it easy for everyone to win more and grow their bankrolls to new levels by sharing our battle-tested strategies so that you have a clear roadmap to achieve massive success.
Thank you for watching the video and being a part of the Linemaker community!
_________________________________________________
sports betting,sports betting strategies,best sports betting strategy,profitable sports betting strategy,profitable sports betting,professional sports betting,how to win at sports betting,how to bet on sports,sports betting research,sports betting tips,sports betting advice,make a profit sports betting,make money on sports betting,make a living off sports betting,make a living betting on sports,sports betting for a living,linemaker sports,linemaker method,Martingale Strategy
Must Be 21+. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
source
36 comments
🚨 Watch Free Strategies To Win Consistently & Grow Your Bankroll Here 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsZmejg215k&list=PLtJ7nFyeMChv6NNRjPpHelah8SAlUhmff
Maybe I'm blind but I don't see a link.
Find a prop with a four under or over straight and start hitting the other side the line will adjustmto you and u dont need -200 you can do it with -120 whatever just find players having outlier days in a row and attack the other side
Imagine wagering $4k to win $50….nah
Thanks Frank. Are you going to do NBA playoffs videos? Good NBA PRA plays are hard to find this time of year with teams tanking and a lot of the stars high usage players out of the lineup.
Knowing that pro sports is scripted has made me a millionaire F all the systems play the storyline
I've never done a $2700 bet. But if they didnt let you. Would they let three bets through? Two of $1000 and one of $700? Or just hope you have a couple books showing both at -200 and split it within the two?
Walang -200 na odds tapos implied probability ay 80 percent -400 Meron 80 percent probablity
Frank, can you do hockey videos?
How are books that far off to give you an 80% play at -200, its implied odds are 66%.
Nah not me 2 game tops 😂
Would you recommend this for live betting? Not sure if they manipulate the lines for live odds or not.
Then you lose 4 in a row and you're -$4000 trying to win $50. It WILL happen eventually.
I dont even understand how a bookmaker normally ban or limit a member.
Please try asian bookmakers like say Singbet(Crown) and see their limits are terribly high.The biggest i saw was ~1.1 million hkd which equals 160k usd on one match.
I know this crazy for most of you to believe.
Which car do you have. Not judging, curious
-400 odds= 80% probability….. my question is how can you get right 80% of the time on -200 odds (Which TRUE odds are under 65% because of the vig)…. With -200 bets, you would be more way more likely to lose 1 of your first 2 bets than to win 2 in a row……. So EVERTHING MUST be relying on 80% true odds for this to work but you also couldnt pay more than -200 prices
Where is the link do we sign up 4 your picks where we can do this. I have been doing this kinda betting for a long time. My favorite way.
Double Down Chasing Your Losses?
Lol dont chase loses i like it though im on the pra bets
I use it on a weekly profit/loss . If I’m betting £100 unit and end of week 1 I am 3 units down , then week 2 I up to £200 a unit , . I’ve never had 4 losing weeks in a row
If you could hit 80% of the time at -200 odds there would be no need to martingale.
What about the sweats you get when you keep increasing the stake.. Would be too much for many of us!!!!
The Vegas gamblers who tried the original Martingale System were happy to see that a Greyhound ticket back to their hometown could usually be had for begging money.
This is called a triplegale, my suggestion would be a double De'lambert. It is perfect for -200, 1.5 odds. If you are hitting 60% or better.
I have used Martingale systems for many years with varying success. I would like to know if, over six years, if you have had 80 sets of winners in games 1-3 at 80+ percent probability. Because if you do lose four in a row, you will wipe out 80 wins. I think you should cut your losses after a game three loss. Then you would lose 1300, which means you need over 26 game 1-3 wins for every 3-game loss. So if those numbers of 26+ winning sets per 3-game loss are solid, you would make a profit by stopping at three contests, win or lose.
Isn't 80% probability translates to a -250 or lower odds? Anyway, this is a good strategy. I've used the old martingale system before and it worked for me until I also lost all of my winnings and bank roll due to unknown probability. With the approximate probability, this strategy would work in the long run. Thanks Frank for educating us
That magic marker is like a screeching chalk board just making my ears cringe 🤦♂️
I feel like martingale only works in sports books if you're doing micro betting… Because if you're betting $100 $500 or $1,000 ect the last thing you need to be doing is the Martinale system because you might end up f**** losing her house at that rate…
Thank you for this Frank!
How many bets to place is the usual on one day if it has the good probability?
Another issue is the juice. Martingale “works” when it’s 1:1. With the juice you’d have to factor in that juice plus each loss. Can get ugly fast if you’re at even odds or in plus money odds it should work but that’s gonna be more risk
Is this considered “chasing” your losses? As always good info.
I might be wrong but -200 bets have only a 65% hit rate not 80%.
Frankengale System
Give us bets to play pal
1st
Comments are closed.