#AIMusicDetection #AIMusicExposed #MusicIndustryNews
In this episode of the Top Music Attorney Podcast, Entertainment Attorney, Miss Krystle discusses how music platforms are developing new technology to detect AI-generated music, which could have major implications for artists. With thousands of AI-created tracks flooding streaming services daily, companies are beginning to take action, raising questions about how AI music will be categorized, promoted, or potentially restricted. As the industry adapts, creators using AI tools may need to consider how these changes could affect their visibility and opportunities.
With lawsuits piling up against AI music platforms like Suno and Udio, the legal landscape remains unclear. Major labels have accused these platforms of training on copyrighted material without permission, leading to debates over fair use and copyright infringement. As platforms improve AI detection, artists using AI in their process may soon have their work flagged or labeled. Whether this is a safeguard or a restriction on creativity remains to be seen, but it’s clear that AI music is facing increasing scrutiny.
0:00 Coming Up
00:19 Introduction
00:40 Deezer’s AI Detection Tool
00:57 10,000 AI Tracks Uploaded To Deezer Every Day
01:25 AI Uses For Music
01:52 Exclusion of Fully AI-Generated Tracks On Deezer
02:59 Complete Accuracy To Detect AI Music
03:41 Suno & Udio Sued For Copyright Infringement
04:19 Risk In Creating AI Music
04:51 Identified As An AI Artist
05:21 Marketing Made Easy Course
05:52 Suno & Udio Claiming Fair Use
06:10 Suno Sued By GEMA
06:31 “Noise” Tracks
07:33 $20 Billion Projected To Be Lost TO AI Music
08:08 Music Platforms Tagging AI Artists
08:27 AI Artists Discrimination
08:52 Caution When Creating AI Music
09:13 Financially Exploiting AI
09:27 Potentially Getting Sued For Using AI Generating Platforms
09:49 Conclusion
Legal Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not intended to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions contained in this video, you should consult your personal attorney. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video. Pursuant to the fair use doctrine under the 1978 Copyright Act, a copyrighted work owned by another may be used for criticism, commentary, news reporting, and educational purposes. The use of the livestream contained in this video falls within the fair use doctrine.
————————————————————————————
🟡Become Your Own Record Label:
https://www.topmusicattorney.com/becomeyourownrecordlabel
💻 #1 Resource For Artists And Producers: https://www.topmusicattorney.com
⚖ Hire An Attorney: https://www.delgadoentertainmentlaw.com
📺 Get Your Music Into Tv/Film/Games: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/sync
📰 Get My Newsletter: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/newsletter/
📄 8 Essential Music Contracts Bundle: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/contractsbundle
🎧 Listen To The TMA Podcast On All Streaming: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/podcast
🟢 Free Stuff: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/free-stuff
Miss Krystle Artist Links: https://www.misskrystle.com
————————————————————————————
TOP MUSIC ATTORNEY SOCIALS
Links: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/links
Website: https://topmusicattorney.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/topmusicattorney/
Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@topmusicattorney?lang=en
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/topmusicattorney
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/top-music-attorney-16405573/
MISS KRYSTLE SOCIALS
Website: http://www.misskrystle.com/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/1g6jAksCoujtcbg6zJpJ39
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/misskrystlelive
Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@misskrystlelive
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MissKrystleLive
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/misskrystle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MissKrystlelive
Website: http://www.misskrystle.com/
VIDEO SHOT AND EDITED BY:
Dukes Up Records
THEME / SHOW MUSIC BY:
That Orko
source
25 comments
⚖ Hire An Attorney: https://www.delgadoentertainmentlaw.com
📈 Marketing Made Easy: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/marketingmadeeasy
🟡 Become your Own Record Label:
https://www.topmusicattorney.com/becomeyourownrecordlabel
💰 $1,000 Cover Song Challenge https://www.topmusicattorney.com/justthetwofus
💻 Website: https://www.topmusicattorney.com
🟢 Free Split Sheet Template: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/splitsheet
📄 Music Contracts Templates: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/music-contracts
📺 Get Your Music Into Tv/Film/Games: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/sync
📰 Get My Newsletter: https://www.topmusicattorney.com/newsletter/
If enough creativity is used to create music in AI, currently, it is going to be tough for anyone to claim any real infringement on songs/music created in a more traditional way. Expecially since Some/Lots of traditional artist produce many products that are almost carbon copies of their own products, but other traditional artist products as well.
A great example is Stevie Ray Vaughan, It's a very well known joke that he's built an entire catalog of music with only "a few songs" Most progressions, lyrical melodies and structures (even key signatures) as EXACTLY the same. lol! Check out a live performance of his to know when I mean. There are many examples of even modern artist doing this and don't even get me started on Pachelbel's Canon and it's musical progression/structure that also all artist use (specifically in the Pop genre) The only way for these labels to combat AI generated music is to go after the process itself, not the music generated. It could be the most complex song structure created, bit by bit and including original lyrics... and still, if it's made with the use of AI, it doesn't matter.
That is incredibly predatory and honestly disgusting. eventually, the music industry will become equivalent to the production and sale of Whale oil. Obsolete due to the advancement of technology used to produce similar products for general, personal and commercial use. Mainly because of how copywrite works today and has worked forever. It may not be in this lifetime, but in 100 years, when 99.9% of all copywrited music today becomes open source in the public domain, there will be no action the music industry will be able to take in regards to AI music production. We're simply ahead of the time when it comes to that technology and while the major labels have majority control of the industry, they are doing the most to try and secure as music revenue as possibly for the moment and the foreseeable future.
Prove to me that your bloody AI is sentient. Prove to me that it is a person, a being with hopes and dreams and love and despair and pain! Show me this, because this well of emotion and heart and soul is the touchstone from which artists create. So prove to me that an AI is a person who FEELS and I will support its right to express itself.
Thing is, that ain't gonna happen because what 'AI' does is just raid the entire world's store of musical, literary, and creative knowledge and then STEAL. If I took a miniature recording device to someone's band practice, recorded their songs secretly, then went and published it all as my music, I'd be busted for plagiarism and copyright infringement and possibly even being a big poopy dicknose bad human. If I cried, "Oh but it wasn't ME that stole, it was my DIGITAL RECORDING DEVICE," does anyone think the court would go OH, RIGHT, NOT GUILTY?
This is what AI CREATORS really are: super fast & comprehensive search engines that can encompass vast areas of human knowledge and then steal from it. There is not one original thought involved here. No AI is gonna get emotional about its Muse because IT DOESNT HAVE ONE.
Imma say this once. Art, which certainly includes music, is the province of sentient beings who can feel passion and heartbreak and love and loss. Artists are alchemists of the first order; we ride that wave of pain and transmute it into joy. Into love.
Every AI created song is composed of bits stolen right out of the souls of real musicians. I despise this trend because it is trickery to steal yet more from real artists under the guise of AI. So I say this to the proponents of AI creation:
Show me an AI that can cry. If you cant do that, kindly stop polluting the already compromised creative space in which I and millions of other musicians live.
Edit: Since you asked, no I do not use AI. At all. Ever.
Unlike youtube, those platforms are more organized and more purposed. Their purpose is for music, real music
Comments are closed.
Add Comment