Here is today’s UWU NEWS giving you all the nuggets you need to add to your understanding of events.
First news video for today: https://youtu.be/hI-8NgLT1Cs
1
ATP Distilled (AI video summaries): https://atpgeo.youtub.erg.uy/
Merchandise for the A Tippling Philosopher blog network and YouTube channel. https://www.redbubble.com/shop/ap/49320825
Buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/GkxsyfQ
Paypal Donate: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/johnnyp76
Please check out this excellent website that compiles useful inks concerning reporting of the war:
https://www.heroyam.org/slava_ukraini
Discord: https://discord.gg/ZZyxVZ64fh
Russian losses open-source data set (from Del):
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=E33161B435D127BA!115352&ithint=file%2cxlsx&authkey=!AIUgFlGIk8-n1hM
UA Supporter merch: https://uasupporter.com/atp
Books
Johnny Pearce books: https://amzn.to/3vv5ZSF
Survival of the Fittest books: https://amzn.to/3TXjp3z
Jonathan MS Pearce books: https://amzn.to/3IbX3sZ
_____
0:00 Start
0:10 Mil Aid
Geopol
_____
Maps often used:
JMSP: https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1EmNXtzoFvvZC2QmK4T_qf1mN95i-SeA
Andrew Perpetua’s Map: https://map.ukrdailyupdate.com/
Blog/column: https://onlysky.media/jpearce/
source
46 comments
https://youtu.be/wly5pS-14r4?si=VDgFStFI0_zKqwqn
Shady vance and trump are pure russian assets.
Finland is absolutely right not to say what they give to Ukraine. Thanks for all your work.
And to brighten your day look up the new Reuters/Ipsos poll. It’s good news, but it’s just one of many polls to come. Still a lot of work to do.
I asked the BBC why they didn't cover the recent admission by Trump as detailed by several reliable sources that he LOST the 2020 election which lie led to the insurrection (World headlines for days) and more-even covered in the presidential debate in detail. Their reply, taking several days is appended below .
When Trump was asked of it he initially said he didn't remember saying it, before when it was quoted back saying it was 'sarcasm'.
So they omitted ANOTHER block-buster headline story realistically as they hadn't done the first one.
Their immediate headline after the debate was that both candidates were accusing each other of lying before later giving a reasonable call out for a bit of a Kamala success
As Kamala called Trump a disgrace, you might consider their coverage now that today their main U.S. story is of Biden swopping hats with a Trump supporter for a few seconds!
You can judge their response which took days as a judge of their quality.
'Thank you for taking the time to contact us. We note your concerns that you feel this particular story was overlooked.
We know that not everyone will agree with our choices on which stories to cover. Our news editors make these complex decisions, based on the editorial merit of all the stories at hand. We accept that not everyone will agree with each decision – various factors are at play and there’s often debate in the newsroom too.
A range of factors affect how we put together our news reports. Is it breaking news, or a dated story? Does it follow on from a recent event, or change our understanding of things? Is it unusual, or attracting national interest?
We appreciate the feedback that our audience give us when it’s felt a story has been overlooked - it too can inform our ongoing work. Suggestions for other stories to consider can be made here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/have_your_say
We very much value your feedback. Complaints are sent to senior management and we’ve included your points in our overnight reports. These reports are among the most widely read sources of feedback in the BBC. This ensures that your concerns have been seen by the right people quickly, and helps to inform decisions about current and future content.
If you’d like to understand how your complaint is handled at the BBC, you might find it helpful to watch this short film https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints. It explains the BBC’s process for responding to complaints and how we share the feedback we receive.
Kind regards,'
Once upon a time even the far right believed that helping anonymously was the most admirable.
Now it almost seems like helping with no return is only for losers.
Comments are closed.
Add Comment