Movie

Michael Knowles REACTS to Civil War Movie

admin232 views



PureTalk – Get 50% off your first month! http://www.PureTalk.com/Knowles

Join Michael Knowles as he delves into the intense and gripping thriller “Civil War,” where America’s future hangs in the balance. In this review, Michael explores the film’s portrayal of a nation torn apart by internal strife, focusing on a team of military-embedded journalists on a desperate quest to interview the President in Washington, D.C. He examines the film’s narrative depth, character development, and its reflection of contemporary political tensions, offering insights that are as thought-provoking as they are entertaining. Tune in to discover whether “Civil War” stands as a cautionary tale that resonates with today’s viewers or simply another dystopian adventure.

Only DailyWire+ members can watch the full episodes of my podcast. Join here: https://bit.ly/3kj7pOd

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. https://www.youtube.com/@MichaelKnowles?sub_confirmation=1

Stop giving your money to woke corporations that hate you. Get your Jeremy’s Razors today at https://ihateharrys.com

You’ve seen it played on The Michael Knowles Show, and now you can play YES-or-NO at home. Get it here: https://bit.ly/45pOROm

Already have the YES-or-NO game? Get your hands on the Conspiracy Expansion Pack before it sells out! https://bit.ly/3PaR0be

#MichaelKnowles #TheMichaelKnowlesShow #News #Politics #DailyWire

source

Related posts

TOP 7 BEST Absolute Masterpiece Movies in Hindi

Mahesh Babu Warns Mukesh Rishi | Srimanthudu Movie Scenes | Shruti Haasan | Koratala Siva | DSP

Top 5 Horror Movies| Tamil Dubbed Movies| Download Link Available

23 comments

@cattalkbmx April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
K.D. looks like she gave up 10 years ago.
@well1012 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Movie was great. Anyone crying about the ambiguity doesn’t get it. The film doesn’t portray journalists in a good light either. Also President was definitely not Trump. Trump never rehearsed his speeches.
@VIP77719 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Journalists are good people?yep that movie is unrealistic😂😂😂
@jkellyid April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
The main thing missing from it to interest me is any real modern war tactics or concerns.

This looks like a 1990s Idea of a civil war when still frame photo journalists still existed.

Does not reflect the majority of what we know from both the global war and terror, the current Ukraine and an Israeli conflicts. It just doesn't reflect modern warfighting concerns.

It also doesn't seem to reflect any sort of electrical or information war. It's very odd
@briancarter9404 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Saw it last night. Appreciate that it wasn’t political at all. Instead it was just a brutal & violent road trip. 8/10 for me.
@loganknight1499 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Definitely not what I expected but still a great movie.
@DogandaTopHat April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
It was kinda slow. The talking seemed contrived and I wasn’t very moved by those scenes. The young woman’s acting was not as good as everyone else. The “press” and Hollywood are aligned in their ideas and goals in real life. So, in the movie it gives the impression that these kind of people could survive war zones just based on their “neutral” opinions. None of these people are actually neutral and it seems naive and unrealistic that any of them would survive. But, what do I know? There are real war journalists. I did like all of the things that Michael mentions. Hard to tell whose side was who, which was good. Road trip style was an interesting premise. I really liked the old guy and felt his death was the most emotional part to the movie. I felt the young woman taking pictures of the seasoned photographer’s death revealed a deep truth about our current culture—everything behind a lens. I thought the movie was overall ok. I feel like it was just missing something that could have made it great.
@lmnop3023 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
I was just wondering what happened to Kirsten Dunst
@walterspence4370 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
There were some militia men fighting the uniform soldiers.. the militia men were all dressed in Hawaiian shirts. Can you really get more 'subitle' than this? Please. They are trying to make Trump voters look as if they destroyed the country. The president in the movie looks like Steve Banon. I wasted my money.
@holdenchute7883 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
I think it is supposed to be so ambiguous to allow the viewer to decide who are the “good guys” and to show an 2nd American civil war won’t be so red and blue more like shades of purple
@beckkavenia3769 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
I would see it, but I hate gore... I dont want war either. I have a new baby and a husband I love very much. I just want to live my life in peace with them.

Your review was good enough for me.
@jeffreylucia2499 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
In any conflict, objectives mean everything. In revolutionary France, fear, murder and false accusations ruled, 40, 000 to be exact. Also in any conflict does commerce continue? Food, gas, electricity?
Police, firemen, emergency services? Farms, etc.
And aftermath. What happens after? If president had so much power, where's congress? Pentagon? Border? Risk of invasion etc?
@nuerotimedivergentuser724 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Communist propaganda 🎉
@thomasjoseph3488 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Pass.
@liberalshaveitallbackwards4667 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
If an actual civil war broke out, it would be between the Democrats/Deep State vs. the people
@petricpaterson April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
The vast majority of the criticisms of the film that i see are from people who are upset that the two sides were undefined and therefore people dont know who to root for. This is ironic because i think that is the purpose of the film. Its not about war or politics or good guys or bad guys. As far as i can tell it is about journalism and photo journalism, but more specifically, what journalism is supposed to be vs. What it is currently in America. Journalism is supposed to be an objective snapshot of the facts of what is currently happening. And that's exactly what the film is supposed to be. A photo of a conflict without the photographers opinions injected into it. So it is vey ironic that most peoples gripe is that they're not told who's side they should be on. I think it is threatening to many people because it forces them to confront the fact that instead of looking at the people that are putting civilians in a mass grave and a tyrannical government that is slaughtering its own citizenry, and saying to themselves "i dont care if that side is left or right, im on the side that is fighting that", they are actually saying "yes, well i see the atrocities that this one side is committing but i dont want to say that im againt them because what if they are are actually portraying the tribe that i belong to". If you see a photo of an atrocity being committed and your first instinct is to make sure that it is not your team committing it before eventually deciding whether or not to condemn it, then you have some soul searching to do.
@korbendallas2354 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
I really liked this movie.. and im glad he didnt trash it like every other right wing commenter i follow.
@korbendallas2354 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
All the western forces at the end besides a few where very white and very male. So it the wf were not that diverse.
@bigmoney1723 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
You're way off. Anyone who follows politics closely knows what side the successionist were with and what side the President was with. There were clear indications throughout the movie. As a matter of fact the right wing boogaloo boys were portrayed in the movie in a fire fight and executing WF prisoners. The movie was Left wing propaganda plain and simple.
@solidus1995 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Missed the part where he explains how the movie is woke and lib
@kevinmclaughlin3088 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
This movie tried so hard to be nuetral that they ended up doing nothing. Some cool action scenes, but it was so shallow that... I didn't really care about anything.
@GunsRbadMkay April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
His name is Pablo Escobar
@KcKing777 April 25, 2024 - 9:52 am
Don't play into their bs Michael. Seeing everything through a skin color lens.

Comments are closed.

Add Comment